Shrek is back, and how! May 20, 2007
Posted by anishkny in Movies.2 comments
Just got back from Shrek III. I was a bit anxious about it after reading a few lukewarm reviews. But the anxiety only caused my expectations to be lowered, and I enjoyed the movie a lot. I was pleasently surprised by the first Shrek movie when it came out (way back when I was still back in India). Despite all bad reviews, the Third on, IMHO, does not disappoint. The writing is crisp, and even though the story is confined by the Hollywood three act structure, it does have its charm. In true Shrek praxis, the damsel in distress construct is subverted with gleeful panache, and we see Shrek being saved by the bra-burning power girl group led by Fiona.
A star studded voice over cast, including the usual Myers-Diaz-Murphy, and even Justin Timberlake do not disappoint. The Shrek Vs. Million Babies dream sequence, and the Prince Artie breakdown scene are hilarious.
Overall a romping good watch… 3.5 stars.
a decrepit attempt at the critical appreciation of guru January 17, 2007
Posted by anishkny in Bollywood, Movies.8 comments
First off let me start off by saying that this is not a review of Guru. It is merely an attempt, as the title suggests, to examine it under some guise of critical discernment. Also, buyer beware! theres a whole lot of spoilers embedded within the text. If you haven’t seen the movie yet, please don’t read this; but be sure to stop by later
Plot
This movie has good plotting, with the hero and villain sides of the conflict well etched out. One feels empathy for both sides, the ambitious businessman who wants to make his corporation the biggest in the country, and the astute Reporter who takes on the task of unshrouding the wake of corruption and skulduggery left by Guru. The link between the two is editor of one of the most scrupulous newspaper organizations in the country. Surprisingly the rise of Guru to the upper echelons of Indian business is relegated almost entirely to the first act, and seems decidedly perfunctory in its execution. This is not what the story is (mainly) about. It is about Guru Vs. “Intrepid Reporter”.
In the second act, the Reporter unearths tons of dirt on Guru, and his not entirely above board means to the end. And he does this with surprising ease, probably the only person who had an easier time succeeding in his goals (as shown in the movie) is Guru himself. Sure he does have his press’s power cut off and his editor’s car attacked but these roadblocks seem superficial at best. The first act complication leads directly to the second act break (Points for that!) i.e. Guru suffers a paralytic attack. And of course the expose by Reporter leads to an investigation into Guru and his eventual indictment. At second act break, the Hero does seem down and out, with half his body motionless, barely able to talk, and with some 30 odd counts of corruption, and other attendant charges.
Climax
Herein lies, probably, the biggest error of the movie, and my biggest bone of contention. The climax is beautifully set up by rest of the movie. Guru is given a chance to speak up in his defence in a closed doors session before the law. He refuses and instead decides to speak up the next day in the presence of reporters and pretty much the whole world. So one would expect this speech to be the pinnacle of good writing, a great man inspired to deliver his finest speech during what might be the last throes of his career. Alas! it falls sorely short of the mark, and what ensues instead can hardly be described as anything more than rambling. I would say big negative marking for this letdown.
Resolution
After the speech itself, the judges’ hearts melt, and they let Guru off the hook, pardoning all but two charges against him and a moderate fine. Now since the climactic speech is so weak, the resolution smells of deus ex machina. The gods appear in the form of sympathy in the bosoms of the judges, and extricate the Hero from his predicament. (-ve points for that).
Symbolism
This is totally subjective. I felt the Jalkukdi character represents both the innocence between the three main protagonists, and also the link between them. To be sure her death is something of a sign.
Cinematography
Rajiv Menon is laboring under the heightened filmic expectations created by his predecessor in the Mani Ratnam camp, Santosh Sivan. Lets face it, the product, though admirable in places, falls short of the mark on the whole. Some minor points: In the shot where Guru rings the school bell before time, as the camera is rising, one can see a slight nudge, due to the crane hitting something. In the shot in front of the train, as the camera descends through the billowing smoke, the lens fogs up ever so slightly, a nice touch (perhaps even accidental?), breaking the perception that these events are viewed via a magical process, not through a boring scientific technique. The songs are a big let down. I mean come on! this is Bollywood, embrace it whole heartedly. We need more visual panache in the song sequences. A few other techniques come to mind; mounting the camera on the swing in Guru’s home for two separate instances in the movie; the blurred slow motion technique used in the climactic speech and other places.
Hopefully I have provided a good enough read, if not a great piece of film appreciation. Keep reading!
top 5 movies of 2006 January 14, 2007
Posted by anishkny in Bollywood, Movies.3 comments
with so much discussion happening these days on this topic, said to myself, might as well get a top 5 Bollywood movies of 2006 (IMHO, of course) out…
5 Pyaar ke Side Effects
4 Khosla ka Ghosla
3 Jaan-e-mann
2 Rang de Basanti
1 Lage Raho Munnabhai
if i get the time and inclination, i’ll put reviews out for each sometime later…